Download A Frightening Love: Recasting the Problem of Evil by Andrew Gleeson PDF

By Andrew Gleeson

A daunting Love considerably rethinks God and evil. It rejects theodicy and its impersonal belief of cause and morality. religion survives evil via a fabulous love that resists philosophical explanation. Authors criticised contain Alvin Plantinga, Richard Swinburne, Marilyn McCord Adams, Peter van Inwagen, John Haldane, William Hasker.

Show description

Read or Download A Frightening Love: Recasting the Problem of Evil PDF

Similar ethics books

The Development of Ethics, Volume 1: From Socrates to the Reformation

Terence Irwin provides a ancient and important examine of the advance of ethical philosophy over thousand years, from historic Greece to the Reformation. beginning with the seminal rules of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle, he courses the reader throughout the centuries that persist with, introducing all the thinkers he discusses with beneficiant quotations from their works.

The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy

This ebook is a research of historic perspectives approximately "moral success. " It examines the basic moral challenge that the various valued elements of a well-lived lifestyles are prone to components open air a person's keep an eye on, and asks how this impacts our appraisal of folks and their lives. The Greeks made a profound contribution to those questions, but neither the issues nor the Greek perspectives of them have obtained the eye they deserve.

Environment Ethics and the Corporation

Synthesising the views of company environmental method, city making plans, overseas environmental international relations and ethics, this learn offers an research of the turning out to be social and environmental accountability in the company quarter. It discusses company innovation, entrepreneurial methods and company tradition from either an environmental and worldwide viewpoint.

Extra info for A Frightening Love: Recasting the Problem of Evil

Example text

They could, if of generous sympathies, well understand why some others cannot believe, even while finding they themselves must believe; indeed – as I argue in denying universalisability – they need not judge the others to be at fault, though they may well seek to change their perspective. But morality – both the greater good sort and the morality of compassion – is transcended in the sense that the tribunal has lost the power to dictate the rejection of God, because for them its authority is met and overcome by love.

There is also love. Once the impersonal conception of thought, to which the sort of moral discussion we find in the literature on the problem of evil belongs, is abandoned, an appeal to love, an appeal that belongs to the existential domain of thought, becomes possible. There is a tradition in western thought which has denied that morality has a monopoly on important and serious value, and that it always trumps any other such value. It does not always have the last word. In particular, to take the Christian version of the thought, it can be opposed, and have a limit set to its authority, by love.

There is an absurdity in the idea that, in the name of morality, we would put an end to the human race, even a wholly voluntary end. He is also right to imply that it is similarly absurd to suggest, on the basis of an analogy between God and human parents, that God should not have created the world. But if I endorse the idea that parents – normal loving parents, not caught in a dilemma, not seeking to prevent the violation of some value dear to them and their sense of life’s importance, and not subject to the sway of some unruly passion – would in fact, and do in fact, have children despite the high probability of their being subject to evil, do I not go back on my emphatic claim from Section 2 that such parents would find the very idea of that unthinkable, however great the ultimate good for their children or anyone else?

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.92 of 5 – based on 9 votes